The Sex Ed We Never Got: A Non-Binary Guide to Intimacy on Our Own Terms
Content note: This article discusses sexual health, kink, substances, and adult topics explicitly. It's written for adults in mind.
A condom stretched over a full human arm without breaking, humorously demonstrating latex elasticity for a condom, indicating you are never “too big”.
Photo: Stephen Toljan / The Vermont Cynic (2019)
Think back to sex ed. If you're lucky, you had a teacher who was visibly uncomfortable explaining condoms on a banana. If you're less lucky, you get a circa 1994 video and a worksheet about abstinence. Either way, nobody talked about desire. Nobody talked about what to do when your body doesn't map onto the diagrams. Nobody mentioned that intimacy could look like a hundred different things depending on who you are, who you're with, and what you actually want.
For non-binary and queer people, that silence was an extremely unhelpful but clear message. Your body, your desires, and your relationships weren't considered worth covering. The curriculum wasn't built for you, and nobody was particularly sorry about it.
So most of us pieced it together ourselves. Reddit threads at midnight. Unexpected Tumblr Porn. ABC Family and The CW. A friend who seemed to know everything, inexplicably. Trial and error ranged from fine to genuinely embarrassing to occasionally unsafe. Some of us got lucky and found community early. A lot of us didn't.
This is the guide that should have existed. Not a sanitised overview of reproductive biology, and not a listicle of sex tips that centres cis bodies, but an actual, honest conversation about intimacy, desire, safety, and pleasure outside the heteronormative script we were all handed by default. The good parts, the awkward parts, the parts nobody warns you about, and the parts mainstream culture still treats like they're too niche to explain.
You deserve real information.
What we're covering:
Desire, lust, and what it actually means to know what you want
Sensuality, intimacy, and slowing the hell down
Practical skills nobody taught you
Kink, BDSM, and why the queer community has been doing consent better than most
Substances, poppers, and harm reduction without the moralising
Bodies, dysphoria, and sex that actually works for you
Consent, Communication, and the Conversation Culture We Actually Need
Resources to keep going from here
Desire, Lust, and Knowing What You Actually Want
Here's something nobody said out loud in any classroom: wanting things is normal. Wanting sex, wanting touch, wanting connection, wanting nothing at all. All of it is normal. But for us, even getting to that baseline took years of unlearning, because the version of desire we were sold was always conveyed through a cisheteronormative lens.
Mainstream culture has a very specific story about desire. It's heterosexual, it's binary, it's directed outward toward a romantic partner of the "opposite" gender, and it leads somewhere to a future marriage, kids, and a mortgage. Desire that doesn't fit that arc gets coded as deviant, confused, a phase, or just not talked about. Which means a lot of us spent formative years either performing desires we didn't have or quietly filing our actual ones under something is wrong with me.
Nothing was wrong with you. The map was just drawn for someone else.
So what actually is lust?
Lust gets a bad reputation: it's either a deadly sin or a punchline. But stripped of the moralising, lust is just intense desire. Physical, emotional, or both. It's the pull toward someone or something that feels urgent and specific. It's also genuinely useful information about yourself.
Knowing what you lust after and being honest about it without immediately editing it for palatability is one of the more useful things you can do for your intimate life. Not because acting on every desire is always the move, but because understanding what you actually want is the foundation on which everything else is built. You can't communicate a desire you haven't acknowledged. You can't set boundaries around things you've convinced yourself you don't want anyway.
For non-binary people specifically, lust can be complicated by dysphoria, by how a partner sees and engages with your body, by the language available to describe what you want. "I want X done to Y part of my body" sounds simple until the language for your body doesn't match how you experience it, or until a partner's framing of what you're doing together lands wrong in a way that's hard to explain mid-moment. This is real, it's common, and it's worth thinking about before you're in the middle of something.
Attraction is not one thing.
If you've ever felt like your attraction doesn't fit neatly into the available categories, you're probably right because attraction is actually several distinct things happening at once, and mainstream culture collapses them into one.
There's sexual attraction: wanting to have sex with someone. There's romantic attraction: the desire for emotional intimacy and partnership. There's an aesthetic attraction: finding someone beautiful or striking without necessarily wanting either. There's sensual attraction: wanting physical closeness, touch, or sensory connection that isn't explicitly sexual. These can occur together, independently, or in combinations that shift depending on the person, the relationship, and the day.
This matters because a lot of queer and non-binary people have spent years confused about why their attraction doesn't behave the way it's supposed to. If you've ever thought, "I want to be close to this person, but I don't know if it's sexual, romantic, or what," you weren't crazy. You were experiencing something real that didn't yet have a label.
The split attraction model, developed largely within asexual and aromantic communities, gave a lot of people language for this. You don't have to identify as ace or aro for it to be useful; it's just a more accurate map of how desire actually works.
If you're still untangling the difference between gender identity and sexuality, we've got a full breakdown in Is Non-Binary a Sexuality?
Knowing what you want takes practice
This sounds obvious until you realise how many people are primarily running off a script of what they think they're supposed to want, what they expected in a relationship, what the other person seems to want, what they've always done, and what feels too weird to say out loud.
Actually knowing what you want requires paying attention to your own responses rather than performing them. It requires being honest in low-stakes moments so you build the strength for higher-stakes ones. It sometimes requires therapy, or journaling, or just lying in the dark thinking about it, or having a very candid conversation with a friend who won't make it weird.
It also requires accepting that what you want might change. Across relationships, across your transition if you're transitioning, across your twenties and thirties, as your relationship with your body shifts. Desire isn't a fixed thing you identify once and file away. It updates.
And if what you want right now is nothing at all that's also valid. What does it mean to be celibate? And how does it differ from the sex ed abstinence teachings, because they're not the same thing and the difference matters.
Sensuality, Intimacy, and Slowing the Hell Down
Western culture has a speed problem with sex. Everything from porn, hookup culture, to the general vibe of how sex gets discussed online implies that the goal is to get there fast and get there hard. Foreplay is treated like a loading screen you have to sit through before the real thing starts. Anything slower, softer, or less goal-oriented gets filed under "not really sex" or, worse, something you do when you're not confident enough for the main event.
This framing is exhausting and actively unhelpful.
What sensualism actually means
Sensualism is the prioritisation of sensory experience as valuable in itself. Touch, taste, scent, sound, temperature, texture. The full-body experience of being present with another person (or yourself) without it needing to arrive anywhere in particular.
This isn't a consolation prize for people who "can't" have conventional sex. It's a completely legitimate approach to intimacy that a lot of people, including people with entirely conventional sex lives, are genuinely missing out on because they've been conditioned to treat everything as a means to an end.
For gender-diverse people navigating dysphoria, sensuality as a framework can be genuinely liberating. When the goal isn't a specific act involving specific body parts, you have more room to figure out what actually feels good in your specific body, with your specific relationship to it, on any given day. That's not a workaround. That's just good sex ed.
The difference between intimacy and sex
These two things overlap, but they are not the same, and conflating them causes real problems.
Intimacy is emotional closeness, vulnerability, and safety with another person. Sex is a set of physical acts. You can have sex without intimacy, and sometimes, that's exactly what you want; that's fine. You can have profound intimacy without sex; that's also fine, and not a lesser version of a relationship. What's less fine is assuming they automatically come packaged together, because then you end up in situations where you're having sex, hoping it will create intimacy that wasn't there, or avoiding intimacy. After all, you've conflated it with a sexual demand you're not ready for.
The intimacy question can also be tangled up with safety. Being emotionally vulnerable with a partner requires trusting that they see you accurately—your gender, your body, your desires—and respond to what's actually there rather than a projection. That trust takes time to build. Rushing past it in favour of getting to the physical stuff is one of the more reliable ways to end up feeling disconnected from an experience that was supposed to feel connecting.
For a deeper look at what intimacy specifically looks like for non-binary people and their partners, read Enby Intimacy: How to Navigate Sex and Gender Dysphoria as a Non-Binary Person.
Slowing down in practice
Practically, what does this look like? A few things worth actually trying:
Communicate before, not just during. The conversation about what you want, what you don't want, which words you prefer for your body, and what your boundaries are is not a mood killer. It is, genuinely, foreplay. People who know what their partner actually wants have better sex. This is not controversial.
Make space for non-sexual touch. Massage, holding, and skin contact without an agenda builds the sensory and emotional foundation that makes sexual intimacy better and also feels good on its own terms. A lot of people are severely touch-deprived and don't realise it until someone touches them with care, and they nearly cry. This is normal. You're not broken. You were starving.
Pay attention to what your body actually responds to, not what it's supposed to respond to. This means slowing down enough to notice. Arousal isn't always loud or obvious, especially if you've spent years in your head about your body. It can be subtle, and you'll miss it if you're moving too fast.
Bring more senses in deliberately. Music matters. Lighting matters. Scent matters more than most people realise; there's a reason candles became a meme and also an entire industry. Temperature, texture, and the weight of something. None of this is performative romance nonsense. Your nervous system is genuinely responsive to the sensory environment, and setting it up intentionally is just using the information you have.
A note on aphrodisiacs
While we're here ✨ aphrodisiacs ✨. The category is real in the sense that certain foods, supplements, and substances have genuine physiological effects on mood, blood flow, and arousal. Dark chocolate contains compounds that support serotonin and dopamine. Oysters are legitimately high in zinc, which supports testosterone production. Chilli increases circulation. Whether any of this reliably makes you horny is more complicated, as context, mindset, and who you're with are doing most of the heavy lifting.
The newer wave of sex chocolate tabs and cacao-based libido supplements sits somewhere between wellness trend and genuinely interesting harm-reduction territory. Some contain adaptogens like ashwagandha or maca that have modest evidence for supporting libido and reducing stress-related sexual dysfunction. Some are mostly vibes. Either way, the ritualisation of desire by setting an intention and building toward an experience has real psychological value, regardless of what the supplement is actually doing chemically. Treat it less like a magic pill and more like a signal to your nervous system that this is time set aside for pleasure. That part works.
The Stuff Nobody Taught You
Let's say it plainly: most people are figuring out sexual skills in real time, on other people, with no prior instruction. That's a weird way to do anything. You wouldn't learn to drive by just getting behind the wheel and hoping your passenger was patient. But somehow this is the standard approach to sexual competence, and we've all just collectively agreed not to mention how strange that is.
This section is practical. It's not going to be coy about what it's covering. If you're in the wrong headspace for frank discussion of sex acts, skip ahead and come back later.
Oral Sex: What Nobody Explained
Oral sex is, for a huge proportion of LGBTQIA+ people, a central part of their sexual experience. It's also almost absent from formal sex education, which means most people learn from porn (bad teacher), from partners (variable), or from trial and error (honest but inefficient).
A few things worth actually knowing:
It's a skill, not an instinct. Nobody is born good at this. The people who are good at it got there through practice, communication, and paying attention. If you've ever felt inadequate about it, the solution is information and feedback, not shame.
Communication is the actual technique. Everybody is different. What worked brilliantly with one partner might do nothing for the next. The single most effective thing you can do, more than any specific technique, is ask what feels good and actually listen to the answer. "Is this good?" "Do you want more pressure?" "Show me what you like" is not an awkward interruption. They're how you get from fine to genuinely good.
On giving a blow job specifically. The anxiety around this is disproportionate to how complicated it actually is. A few genuinely useful things: your hand and your mouth work together, not separately. Suction matters more than depth; the idea that depth equals skill is largely a porn construction and not reflective of what most people actually enjoy. Your jaw will get tired, and that's normal, not a personal failing. Teeth are fine in small amounts for some people, and a hard no for others. Enthusiasm, genuine or performed, matters more than most people expect it to because it communicates that you want to be there.
For giving oral sex to partners with penises, none of this requires you to frame the act in gendered terms. The language you use with your partner can be whatever works for both of you. You don't have to adopt terminology that doesn't fit your identity to participate in this.
On receiving oral sex. This is where a lot of non-binary people, particularly those with complicated relationships to their genitals, can find things difficult. Dysphoria during sex is real, and it can show up unexpectedly even with a partner you trust. A few things that can help: communicating preferred language for your body parts before things get started, not during (less pressure, clearer headspace). Positions that keep your focus on sensation rather than your body being observed. Explicit verbal affirmation from your partner that they want to be there. None of these is guaranteed to fix, but they're practical starting points.
Safer oral sex. Barriers exist for oral sex, and they work. Dental dams for vulvas and anuses, condoms for penises. The STI transmission risk for oral sex is lower than for penetrative sex, but it is not zero. Herpes, gonorrhoea, and syphilis are transmitted orally. This isn't meant to be alarming; it's just accurate. If you're not using barriers, regular STI testing is the move.
Penetrative sex and anatomy-neutral framing
Penetrative sex means different things for different bodies and different combinations of partners. For non-binary people, the heteronormative framing of "who goes where" is often irrelevant or actively unhelpful. What matters is consent, communication, preparation, and safety, regardless of what anatomy is involved.
A few universals worth stating:
Lube is not optional. It is a tool. The idea that needing lube means something went wrong is a myth that has caused a genuinely unnecessary amount of discomfort. Use it. For anal sex specifically, lube is non-negotiable as the anus does not self-lubricate, and the tissue is delicate. Silicone-based lube lasts longer but degrades silicone toys. Water-based lube is compatible with everything. Oil-based lube is not compatible with latex condoms. Know your materials.
For anal sex. Go slow, communicate constantly, and stop if something hurts sharply or in the wrong way. Some discomfort during initial penetration is common. Pain that doesn't ease is a signal, not something to push through. The internal sphincter relaxes involuntarily with arousal, and you cannot force it; attempting to do so causes injury. Preparation (cleaning, if that's your preference) is personal, and there are various approaches; none is mandatory, but knowing your options can reduce anxiety.
Barrier methods matter for all of this. Condoms for penetrative sex!! Use fresh condoms when switching between partners or between anal and vaginal sex. This is not overthinking it; this is just accurate risk management.
Bodies, pleasure, and the parts nobody maps
Erogenous zones extend well beyond genitals, and this is somehow still undersold. The neck, inner wrists, backs of the knees, scalp, lower back, and inner thighs vary from person to person but are worth exploring both alone and with partners. For non-binary people with dysphoria around specific body parts, knowing that pleasure isn't confined to those parts is practically useful, not just reassuring.
Masturbation as a learning tool is also worth stating plainly. Knowing your own body, what you respond to, what you don't, what you want language used for what, is information you can communicate to partners. It's not a substitute for partnered sex. It's research.
Kink, BDSM, and Why the Queer Community Has Been Doing Consent Better Than Most
Kink has a PR problem. In mainstream media, it's either fetishised into something unrecognisable or treated as inherently predatory, the domain of people with something wrong with them, doing things to other people who probably didn't fully agree. What rarely gets said, especially outside queer spaces, is that the BDSM and kink community has developed some of the most rigorous, thoughtful consent frameworks of any sexual community. And queer people have been at the centre of that for decades.
This isn't a defence of everything that happens under the kink umbrella; bad actors exist everywhere. It's an accurate account of what the community actually looks like when it's functioning as intended.
What BDSM actually is
BDSM is an acronym that covers a broad range of practices and dynamics:
B/D — Bondage and Discipline. Bondage involves physical restraint like rope, cuffs, tape, whatever. Discipline involves agreed-upon rules and consequences within a dynamic.
D/S — Dominance and Submission. A power dynamic in which one person takes a leading role and another a following role. This can be purely in the bedroom or extend into a broader relationship structure (called a 24/7 or TPE dynamic). Neither role implies anything about the person's personality or identity outside the dynamic.
S/M — Sadism and Masochism. Sadism is deriving pleasure from giving pain or intensity. Masochism is deriving pleasure from receiving it. Both are consensual in a healthy kink context. The masochist is not a victim, and the sadist is not an abuser. Consent and active enjoyment are what distinguish kink from harm.
These categories overlap constantly, and most people in kink communities don't identify neatly with one. Someone might be dominant in one relationship and submissive in another. Someone might enjoy bondage and have zero interest in pain. The categories are loose descriptors, not fixed identities.
One practice that's moved from niche kink spaces into broader internet culture recently is gooning, if you've seen the term and aren't sure what it actually refers to or where the line is, What Does "Gooning" Mean? The Slang, the Psychology, and the "Goon State" Explained covers it without the sensationalism.
Why the queer community developed better consent practices
The mainstream sexual culture most of us grew up in treated consent as a binary yes or no, and mostly implied rather than stated. The kink community, shaped significantly by queer and LGBTQ+ people from the leather and BDSM scenes of the 70s and 80s onward, built something more sophisticated because it had to.
When you're doing things that look, from the outside, like one person hurting another or one person being controlled by another, you need clear systems to distinguish what's happening from actual abuse. That necessity produced tools that, honestly, vanilla sexual culture still hasn't caught up to.
Negotiation happens before a scene. What's on the table, what's not, what you want to try, what your limits are, what headspace you're in today. Not assumed; discussed. Every time.
Safewords give the person in the less powerful position (or both people) a clear, unambiguous way to pause or stop that exists outside the dynamic. The most common system is traffic light: green (good), yellow (slow down or check in), red (stop completely). Some dynamics use non-verbal signals for situations where speaking isn't possible.
Aftercare is the period after a scene where both people return to baseline together. This might mean physical comfort, such as blankets, water, or holding. It might mean verbal reassurance. It might mean space. What it isn't is one person leaving immediately and the other person processing alone what just happened in their body and head. The Drop — the emotional and physical comedown after intense kink — is real and can be significant. Aftercare exists because the community recognised this and developed a response.
Check-ins during a scene are normal. "How are you?" "Still good?" "Want to keep going?" This is not breaking the mood. This is how you make sure the person you're with is actually present and enjoying themselves rather than tolerating something they've dissociated from.
Kink and gender identity
Kink spaces have historically been among the more gender-affirming environments available to non-binary and trans people, not universally, and not without problems, but structurally. Because kink is built around chosen roles rather than assumed ones, it sidesteps a lot of the gendered assumptions that make mainstream sexual culture difficult to navigate.
In a D/S dynamic, who leads and who follows is negotiated, not determined by anatomy or perceived gender. In bondage, who's restrained and who's doing the restraining isn't mapped onto who's the "man" or the "woman" in the situation. For non-binary people who find that conventional sexual scripts keep forcing them into gendered roles that don't fit, kink offers a framework where roles are explicit, chosen, and separable from identity.
Kink communities also tend to have more developed language for bodies, using anatomical terms or negotiated personal terms rather than defaulting to gendered language. This isn't universal, and you will still encounter people who get it wrong. Still, the norm of explicit negotiation means there's a natural opening to establish your preferences before anything starts.
What to actually know before you explore
If you're curious about kink and haven't explored it, a few genuinely useful starting points:
Read before you do. The kink community has extensive written resources. The New Topping Book and The New Bottoming Book by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy are foundational. Online communities like FetLife exist, with all the caveats that come with any online community approach; approach with appropriate scepticism and take time to observe before engaging.
Start with low-stakes exploration. You don't need to jump into an elaborate scene. Introducing light restraint, power dynamics in communication, or sensation play (temperature, texture, pressure) with a trusted partner is a low-risk way to figure out what you're actually interested in.
Kink is not a relationship replacement. A common mistake is assuming that a D/S dynamic will create intimacy where none otherwise exists. It doesn't. A kink dynamic built on top of poor communication, unequal respect, or unclear consent is just a regular bad relationship with extra steps.
Know the difference between a kink and a need you're not getting met otherwise. Some people come to kink looking for control or submission because something in their life feels out of control or unseen. That's worth examining. Kink can be a healthy outlet for a lot of things, but it's not therapy, and it won't fix something that needs actual attention.
A note on the community's imperfections
The BDSM community is not a utopia. Racism, fatphobia, transphobia, and predatory behaviour exist in kink spaces as they exist everywhere. The consent frameworks described above are norms, not guarantees, and they're more consistently upheld in some spaces than others. Newcomers, especially young people, queer people, and people with trauma histories, are sometimes targeted by people who use the language of kink to bypass consent rather than build it.
Trust your instincts. Anyone who pressures you to do something before you've negotiated it, dismisses your use of safewords as "breaking the scene," or frames your boundaries as inexperience to be overcome, is not practising ethical kink. They're just doing what they were going to do anyway, with better vocabulary.
Substances, Poppers, and Harm Reduction Without the Moralising
Firstly, harm reduction is NOT endorsement.
Explaining what something is, how it works, and how to use it more safely does not mean recommending it. What it means is treating you like an adult who will make their own decisions and deserves accurate information to do so.
The alternative, not talking about it, leaving people to figure it out from unreliable sources, or burying the information in so much moralising that nobody reads it, has a documented body count. So we're going to talk about it plainly.
Poppers (what they actually are)
Poppers are the common name for alkyl nitrites, most commonly amyl nitrite, butyl nitrite, or isobutyl nitrite. They come in small bottles, you inhale the vapour (not the liquid), and the effect hits within seconds and lasts roughly two to three minutes.
What they do physiologically: they relax smooth muscle tissue throughout the body, including the walls of blood vessels and (relevant to why they're popular in queer sex) the anal sphincter. They also cause a brief drop in blood pressure and a head rush that most people describe as warm, floaty, and intensifying of whatever sensory experience is already happening.
They've been part of gay and queer sexual culture since the 1970s, originally marketed as room deodorisers to sidestep drug regulations. If you've spent any time in queer clubs or sex-positive spaces, you've almost certainly encountered them.
The actual risks
Poppers are generally considered low-risk for healthy adults when used as intended—inhaled, not ingested. But there are real risks worth knowing:
The interaction with PDE5 inhibitors is serious. PDE5 inhibitors are erectile dysfunction medications such as Viagra (sildenafil), Cialis (tadalafil), and Levitra (vardenafil). Both poppers and these medications drop blood pressure. Combined, that drop can be severe enough to cause loss of consciousness, heart attack, or stroke. This is not a theoretical risk. Do NOT combine them.
Chemical burns are real. The liquid itself is caustic. If it spills on skin, particularly sensitive skin, or mucous membranes, it causes chemical burns. Keep the bottle upright, don't use near open flames, and if it spills on you, rinse immediately with water.
Popper maculopathy is a less commonly discussed but well-documented risk, a form of vision damage associated with heavy, frequent use. It's typically reversible with cessation, but in some cases it isn't. It's more associated with chronic heavy use than occasional use, but it's worth knowing.
Headaches are extremely common, especially if you use too much or in a poorly ventilated space. Not dangerous, just unpleasant.
Avoid if you have cardiovascular conditions, low blood pressure, anaemia, or are pregnant. The blood pressure drop that's a pleasant head rush for a healthy person can be a medical event for someone with underlying conditions.
Chemsex (the bigger conversation)
Chemsex refers specifically to the use of drugs in a sexual context, and it's a significant part of gay and queer men's culture in particular, though not exclusively. The drugs most associated with chemsex are methamphetamine (crystal meth, or Tina), GHB/GBL, and mephedrone (meow meow). Poppers are sometimes included in the conversation but are generally considered a separate, much lower-risk category.
This is not a section about whether chemsex is good or bad. It's a section about reality.
Chemsex happens. It happens in communities with high rates of social isolation, stigma, trauma, and limited access to mental health support. It happens because the drugs involved create intense feelings of connection, reduced inhibition, and prolonged sexual experience. It also happens because some people enjoy it and aren't in crisis about it.
The risks are real, and they're significant. GHB and GBL have an extremely narrow margin between a recreational dose and an overdose, more so than almost any other common recreational drug. Never use GHB/GBL alone. Never mix with alcohol (both are CNS depressants, and the combination dramatically increases overdose risk). Know what a GHB overdose looks like: unresponsiveness, slow or stopped breathing, blue lips. Put the person in the recovery position and call emergency services immediately, as this is a medical emergency, not something to sleep off.
Crystal meth is highly addictive, causes significant cardiovascular strain, and is associated with compulsive sexual behaviour that frequently leads to situations people wouldn't have consented to sober. If you or someone you know is using regularly and struggling to stop, that's worth taking seriously and worth getting support for without shame.
If you're going to use substances in sexual contexts, a few harm reduction basics apply regardless of what you're using: don't use alone, tell someone you trust what you're taking, start with a low dose and wait before redosing, know what the substance actually is before you take it (fentanyl contamination of the drug supply is not a theoretical risk), and have a plan for if things go wrong.
Alcohol (the one everyone forgets to include)
Alcohol is a substance. It's legal, it's normalised, and it impairs judgment and consent in the same ways other drugs do, just with better marketing. A few things worth saying plainly:
Sex that happens because both people were drunk enough to do something they wouldn't have done sober is not automatically fine because alcohol is legal. Consent under significant intoxication is murky at best and not consent at worst. This applies to you as both a potential initiator and a potential recipient.
Alcohol also suppresses sensation and makes it harder to read your own body's signals. The sex you have drunk is generally not as good as the sex you have sober or lightly buzzed, even if it felt less awkward to initiate. This is not a moral statement. It's physiology.
Cannabis and Sex
Worth a brief mention because it's increasingly legal in many countries and genuinely used by a lot of people for exactly this purpose. Cannabis can increase sensory sensitivity and reduce performance anxiety for some people, which is why it's popular in sexual contexts. It can also increase anxiety and paranoia for others or cause dissociation that makes it harder to stay present. This is highly individual and dose-dependent.
If you're using cannabis before or during sex and finding it makes things worse rather than better, more in your head, less connected, more anxious, that's useful information. It's not for everyone in this context.
Resources, not judgment
If anything in this section is relevant to your life in a way that's causing you concern, your own use, a partner's use, experiences you've had that didn't feel okay, some resources won't lecture you.
GMFA (formerly the Gay Men's Fighting AIDS, now a broader sexual health charity) has harm reduction resources specifically for queer communities. The Love Tank and 56 Dean Street in the UK, ACON in Australia and Burnett Foundation in Aotearoa New Zealand, and local sexual health clinics in the US are all good starting points for non-judgmental support. Many offer chemsex-specific support that won't treat you like a cautionary tale.
Bodies, Dysphoria, and Sex That Actually Works for You
This is probably the section most specific to non-binary and trans people, and the one least likely to exist anywhere in mainstream sex education. It's also genuinely the one that matters most for a lot of people reading this.
Body dysphoria and sex are a complicated combination. Not everyone who is non-binary experiences dysphoria, which is worth saying upfront, because the assumption that all non-binary people are in constant distress about their bodies is its own kind of flattening. But a lot of people do, and even people who don't experience chronic dysphoria can find that it shows up unexpectedly during intimacy in ways that are disorienting and hard to explain in the moment.
This section is about making sex actually work for the body and mind you have, not the one the script assumed.
What dysphoria during sex actually feels like
Dysphoria isn't always the dramatic, floor-collapsing experience it gets portrayed as. During sex, it often shows up as something quieter and more insidious: a sudden disconnection from what's happening, a flash of wrongness when a partner uses a specific word or touches a specific place, a feeling of being observed as the wrong thing, a retreat into your head at exactly the moment you were trying to be present.
It can also be anticipatory; the anxiety about dysphoria showing up is sometimes more disruptive than dysphoria itself. You're managing the experience and monitoring for problems while trying actually to be there. That's exhausting, and it can make intimacy feel like work in a way that's hard to explain to a partner who doesn't share the experience.
Some people find that dysphoria during sex gets better with transition (medical, social, or both). Some find it shifts rather than resolves. Some find it's partner-dependent, or position-dependent, or language-dependent. There's no universal trajectory, and anyone telling you it definitely gets better or definitely doesn't is extrapolating from their own experience.
Practical approaches that actually help
These are not guarantees. They're starting points that work for enough people to be worth knowing.
Name your preferences before you're in the moment. The conversation about what language you prefer for your body, what you want touched and how, and what's off the table is much easier to have outside of a sexual context. Not because it's a difficult conversation, it doesn't have to be, but because having it beforehand means neither of you is navigating it while also trying to be present in your body. It becomes information your partner already has, rather than something that needs to be managed mid-scene.
Establish language that works for you. A lot of non-binary people develop personal terminology for their bodies that sidesteps gendered anatomical terms. This is valid and practical, and a good partner will adopt it without making a big deal. If a partner consistently uses language for your body that you've asked them not to use, that's information about them, not an inevitability you have to manage.
Clothing and partial undress are options. Sex does not require full nudity. For people with dysphoria around specific body parts, keeping certain things covered, a binder, a shirt, or underwear, is a legitimate choice that partners should respect without requiring justification. If a partner makes you feel like this is unusual or a problem, that's on them.
Positions and angles matter beyond just physical preference. Some positions make it easier to stay in your head about your body; you're too visible, or the angle draws attention to something you'd rather not focus on. Others let you be present in sensation without as much self-observation. Figuring out which is which for you is worth the experimentation.
Verbal affirmation from partners helps more than most people expect. Being explicitly told that your partner wants to be there, finds you attractive, and sees you as you are isn't just reassurance-seeking. It's counterinformation to the dysphoric narrative. Some people find it helpful to ask for this explicitly. That's not neediness. That's knowing what you need.
Sex and medical transition
If you're on HRT or considering it, it's worth knowing that hormones affect sexuality in ways that aren't always discussed.
Testosterone (T) typically increases libido, often significantly, particularly in the first year. It also changes where and how arousal manifests physically. Genital changes include growth and increased sensitivity, and some people find this affirming, while others find it a complicated mix. Vaginal atrophy (dryness and thinning of tissue) can occur with testosterone use and is manageable with topical oestrogen (which doesn't counteract T systemically) or high-quality lube. This is a medical reality, not something to push through.
Oestrogen and anti-androgens (for people assigned male at birth on feminising HRT) typically decrease libido initially, sometimes significantly. Genital sensitivity changes. Erections may become less frequent or less reliable. This is distressing for some people and neutral or positive for others; both responses are valid. Libido often stabilises after the initial adjustment period, though the timeline varies.
None of these changes is a permanent lock on your sexual experience. They're adjustments to navigate, and talking to a doctor who actually knows about trans healthcare (not just a GP Googling it in front of you) is worth seeking out.
Navigating sex with dysphoria and a new partner
New partners present a specific challenge because you're doing two things at once: building the sexual and physical connection, and also establishing the groundwork of how they see and engage with your body. That's a lot.
A few things worth considering:
You don't owe anyone a complete account of your gender history, your dysphoria, or your medical status before or during sex. What you do need to communicate is what you need for the experience to be good, your preferred language, your boundaries, and what you want. Those are practical things, not confessionals.
How a new partner responds to your preferences in the first sexual encounter tells you a lot. Someone who takes your language preferences on board without making it a thing, who checks in naturally, who responds to your cues, that's a person worth continuing with. Someone who pushes back, makes it weird, or keeps forgetting that's also information.
Trust that builds over time genuinely changes the experience. Sex with someone who knows you, knows your body, and has some established shorthand with you is different to sex with someone new. Both have value. But if sex with new people is consistently dysphoria-heavy and sex with established partners isn't, that's a pattern worth noting rather than treating each experience as its own isolated event.
If you're still figuring out where to find partners who actually get it from the start, The Best Dating Apps for Non-Binary People is worth a read before you download anything.
When it's not working, and that's okay.
Sometimes dysphoria wins the day. Sometimes you're mid-experience, and it's just not working, and the kindest thing you can do is acknowledge that and stop. That's not failure. That's having a body with a complex relationship to itself and not forcing it through something that's become uncomfortable or disconnected.
A partner worth having will be okay with this. Not performatively okay, actually okay. The ability to stop without it becoming a whole thing is part of what makes a sexual relationship feel safe enough to try in the first place.
You're also allowed to have periods where sex is just not on the table. Transition, mental health, external stress, grief, and medication changes a lot of things that affect libido and capacity for intimacy. The cultural pressure to maintain a consistent and enthusiastic sexual self regardless of what's happening in your life is pressure you can put down.
Consent, Communication, and the Conversation Culture We Actually Need
Consent has had a marketing moment. In the last decade, it went from something nobody talked about publicly to something everyone says they support, which sounds like progress until you notice that the actual practice of it hasn't caught up nearly as much as the rhetoric has. We added "consent is important" to the cultural vocabulary without meaningfully changing how most people actually navigate sexual situations. That gap is where a lot of harm still lives.
For LGBTQIA+ people, the consent conversation has additional layers. Because our bodies, desires, and relationships don't map onto default assumptions, we often need more explicit communication to have a baseline experience that works, which means we've frequently had to develop consent skills out of necessity that a lot of straight, cisgender people genuinely never had to build.
That's worth naming. And then building on.
What consent actually is
Consent is an ongoing, informed, enthusiastic, and reversible agreement to a specific thing. Every word in that sentence is doing work.
Ongoing — not a one-time yes that covers everything forever. Consent to one thing is not consent to everything. Consent given last week is not consent given now. Consent given at the start of an encounter doesn't mean checking in becomes unnecessary as things develop.
Informed — you can't meaningfully consent to something you don't understand or haven't been accurately represented. This applies to acts, dynamics, substances, and context.
Enthusiastic — this is the part that makes a lot of people uncomfortable, because it raises the bar above "they didn't say no." Absence of refusal is not the same as agreement. Reluctant compliance is not the same as wanting to be there. The standard worth holding yourself to is whether the person you're with actually wants what's happening, not just whether they haven't explicitly objected.
Reversible — anyone can change their mind at any point, for any reason, including no reason. Mid-encounter. After agreeing enthusiastically five minutes ago. After doing the same thing ten times before. A person changing their mind is not a betrayal or a rule violation. It's a person exercising the right they have always had.
The gap between knowing this and doing it
Most people, if asked, would agree with everything above. The actual practice is harder, for reasons worth examining rather than glossing over.
Asking for consent can feel like it breaks the mood, and this feeling is a cultural artefact, not a natural law. It exists because we've been shown, repeatedly, that sexual escalation is supposed to be seamless and intuitive, and that stopping to check in signals awkwardness or lack of confidence. That framing serves people who benefit from ambiguity. It does not serve you.
In practice, consent conversation integrated naturally into intimacy doesn't break anything. "Is this okay?" "Do you want to keep going?" "What do you want?" — these are not clinical interruptions. They're expressions of actual interest in the person you're with. Partners who experience check-ins as mood-breaking are usually partners who prefer the ambiguity.
Giving consent is also a skill that takes practice. A lot of people, particularly people who grew up being told their desires were wrong, complicated, or not worth expressing, have difficulty clearly stating what they want and don't want. The muscle of saying "yes, I want that," "no, not that," "slow down," or "I want to stop" doesn't develop automatically. It develops through practice in low-stakes situations and through being in relationships where it's safe to use.
Non-verbal communication and its limits
Non-verbal cues are real, and they matter. Reading a partner's body language, responsiveness, and energy is a genuine skill and part of being a present, attentive sexual partner. But non-verbal communication has real limits that are worth being honest about.
Non-verbal cues are ambiguous. What reads as enthusiasm in one person reads as politeness in another. Stillness can mean relaxed or frozen. Quietness can mean absorbed, or it can mean checked out. Unless you know someone very well and have established a baseline, non-verbal cues are data points, not conclusions.
This is especially true for people with trauma histories, for whom the body's response to unwanted situations can look deceptively like compliance. Fawn responses, placating, going along with things, performing okayness, are involuntary trauma responses, not choices. If you're relying entirely on non-verbal cues with someone you don't know well, you may be reading a trauma response as consent.
Verbal check-ins are not a replacement for attentiveness to non-verbal cues. They work together. The combination of actually watching how your partner responds and asking them directly is more reliable than either alone.
Communication before, during, and after
Good sexual communication isn't one conversation. It's ongoing across three phases, each serving a different function.
Before — this is where you establish preferences, limits, language, and intentions. It doesn't need to be formal or lengthy. It can be as simple as "I like this, I don't like that, use this word for this." For new partners, especially, this conversation is genuinely useful and, when done right, builds anticipation rather than killing it. Knowing what someone wants is its own form of intimacy.
During check-ins, adjustments, and direction. "More of that." "Can we change position?" "I need a minute." The ability to communicate during a sexual encounter is a skill that improves with practice and with partners who respond well to it. If you're with someone who responds to in-the-moment communication with irritation or disappointment, file that information carefully.
After — this is underrated and underused outside of kink communities that have formalised it as aftercare. How did that go? Was there anything that didn't work? Was there anything really good? This conversation doesn't need to be an immediate debrief; timing matters, and sometimes it's best to have it the next day. But having it at all, with a regular partner, is how you build an ongoing sexual relationship that actually improves over time rather than staying fixed at whatever it was on day one.
Consent in queer and non-binary specific contexts
A few things that come up specifically in queer and non-binary sexual contexts and don't get enough dedicated discussion:
Outing and disclosure. You are not obligated to disclose your gender history, trans status, or medical history to a sexual partner. Full stop. The ongoing legal and cultural debate about this notwithstanding, your history is yours. What you do need to disclose are things that materially affect your partner's health (relevant STI status) or that they have a reasonable expectation of knowing for informed consent about the specific acts involved. Your gender identity is not in that category.
Misgendering during sex. If a partner misgenders you during sex, uses wrong pronouns, wrong terms for your body, frames what's happening in gendered terms that don't fit, you are allowed to correct it in the moment. You are allowed to stop if it continues. You are allowed to treat it as a dealbreaker. You don't have to absorb it silently to avoid disrupting the experience.
Power imbalances in queer relationships. The assumption that queer relationships are automatically more equal than straight ones doesn't hold up. Coercion, manipulation, and boundary violations happen in queer relationships. The shared identity doesn't create shared values or shared safety. Trusting your instincts about a dynamic that feels off is valid regardless of the gender or identity of the person involved.
Community overlap and social consequences. Queer communities are often small, particularly outside major cities. The social consequences of sexual encounters, who knows what, how things end, how you navigate running into someone, are more immediate and more complicated than in contexts where your dating pool isn't also your social circle. This doesn't change the fundamentals of consent, but it does add a layer of complexity to navigating it.
Building a personal consent practice
Consent isn't just something you do with partners. It's a broader orientation toward your own desires and boundaries that makes the partnered stuff possible.
Knowing your own limits and being honest about them, rather than overriding them to keep things smooth, is the foundation. Practising saying no in low-stakes situations. Noticing when you're going along with something you don't want and asking yourself why. Recognising the difference between stretching your comfort zone in a way that's genuinely your choice and tolerating something because refusing felt harder.
This is internal work, and it doesn't happen overnight. A lot of queer people carry significant histories of having their desires dismissed, overridden, or treated as less valid by families, by institutions, by partners. Rebuilding a clear sense of your own wants and limits from underneath that takes time and sometimes support.
Therapy, if you have access to it, is worth mentioning here specifically, therapy with someone who actually understands queer and non-binary experience, not someone who treats your identity as the thing to be worked through. The availability of this varies enormously by location. Online options have expanded access meaningfully in the last few years.
You Deserved Better Sex Ed — And You Can Still Have It
Here's the honest summary of everything this guide has covered: none of it should have been this hard to find.
The information in this guide about desire, about bodies, about consent, about substances, about kink, about dysphoria is not radical or obscure. It's the baseline of what anyone navigating an intimate life actually needs to know. The fact that it wasn't handed to you in school, or by your family, or by the culture you grew up in, is not a reflection of how complicated or niche your needs are. It's a reflection of who those institutions decided was worth educating.
That decision was wrong. And the gap it left is real in the form of experiences that felt off. Still, you didn't have language for situations you navigated without the information you needed, bodies you felt disconnected from because nobody ever talked about yours, desires you spent years editing because you'd never seen them treated as legitimate.
You're not catching up. You're just getting what you were always owed, slightly later than you should have.
What to actually take from this
This guide isn't a checklist. You don't need to have tried everything here or have opinions on all of it. Sexuality is personal, it changes, and there is no correct or complete version of it to arrive at.
What's worth taking away is simpler: your desires are legitimate, your body is worth understanding, your safety matters, and the people you're intimate with should operate from the same baseline. Everything else, the specific acts, the dynamics, the language, the pace, is yours to figure out on your own terms.
The queer and non-binary communities that came before us built a lot of this framework under conditions that were significantly more hostile than most of us are navigating now. The consent culture in kink spaces, the harm reduction resources in queer health organisations, the language developed in ace and aro communities for talking about attraction, all of it exists because people who mainstream institutions weren't serving built their own. That's worth knowing and worth continuing.
Keep going from here
This guide covers a lot of ground, but it's not exhaustive; nothing of this length could be. Here's where to go next, depending on what resonated:
For desire, attraction, and identity:
Is Non-Binary a Sexuality? — if the split attraction model section opened questions you want to keep pulling on
How to Know If You’re Non-Binary: Signs, Questions & Next Steps — Wondering “Am I non-binary?” This guide explores common signs, gentle self-reflection questions, and next steps without pressure or gatekeeping.
The Asexual Visibility and Education Network (AVEN)has some of the most thorough community-built resources on attraction and identity available anywhere online
For intimacy and relationships:
Enby Intimacy: How to Navigate Sex and Gender Dysphoria as a Non-Binary Person — the companion piece to this guide's sensuality section
The Ethical Slut by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy — covers non-monogamy,y but is genuinely one of the better books on communication and intimacy regardless of relationship structure
For kink and BDSM:
What Does "Gooning" Mean? The Slang, the Psychology, and the "Goon State" Explained
The New Topping Book and The New Bottoming Book by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy
FetLife, as a community resource, should be approached with appropriate caution, as with any online community
For celibacy and intentional non-sexuality:
What Does It Mean to Be Celibate? A Guide to Radical Autonomy— because choosing not to have sex is also a valid thing to understand clearly
For finding people worth having any of this with:
Best Dating Apps for Non-Binary People (2026): Tinder, Hinge, Lex, HER & More — because the pool matters
Best Apps & Online Spaces for Non-Binary People (2026 Guide)
For harm reduction and sexual health:
Scarleteen — genuinely excellent sex ed resource, more thorough than most things written for adults
ACON — LGBTQ+ health organisation covering Australia and NZ with solid harm reduction resources
56 Dean Street — London-based sexual health clinic with extensive queer-specific resources available online regardless of location
Planned Parenthood — US-based,d but their online resources are thorough and identity-inclusive
GMFA — queer sexual health resources with specific chemsex harm reduction content
For mental health and support
QLife — LGBTQ+ peer support, Australia and NZ
Trevor Project — US-based crisis and support resource
Switchboard — UK LGBTQ+ support line
A note on ongoing learning
The landscape of queer and non-binary sexual health resources is genuinely better than it was ten years ago and still not good enough. Misinformation circulates, community knowledge is inconsistent, and access to affirming healthcare varies enormously depending on where you live. Being a critical reader of this guide is part of the practice. If something here didn't match your experience, that's valid. If something was missing, that's worth noting. The comments are open, and this community learns better collectively than any single guide can manage alone.
One last thing
The version of intimacy you were implicitly offered, straight, binary, goal-oriented, largely unspoken, was never going to fit. That's not a personal failure. It was always the wrong template.
Building something that actually works for you, in the body you have, with the desires you actually have, communicated clearly to people who actually see you, that's not a consolation prize for people who couldn't manage normal. That's just a better version of intimacy than most people ever get around to having.
You might as well have it.
What's the one thing you wish someone had actually told you before you figured it out the hard way? Drop it in the comments — the collective knowledge in this community is genuinely more useful than anything we could fit into one guide.
Enjoyed this read?
Follow Enby Meaning for more. Subscribe, share, and check out a few posts that connect to this one ↓
